|
News

New Study Shows How Current Pesticide Reduction Measures Fail to Protect Vulnerable Groups from Pesticide Pollution

This article was originally published by Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL)

new study carried out in the Italian province of Bolzano-South Tyrol reveals that despite measures taken by local authorities to reduce pesticide pollution, synthetic pesticides that can harm human health and the environment are still detected in children’s playgrounds and schoolyards in the nearby region [1, 2].

The study, a collaboration among experts from the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL), Pesticide Action Network (PAN) Europe, PAN Germany and the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences in Vienna (BOKU), was carried out in one of the main agricultural regions for apples and wine production in Europe. The researchers looked at official data of 306 grass samples collected from 88 non-agricultural public sites such as children’s playgrounds, market places and schoolyards between 2014 and 2020.

Market places were one of the public sites that the official data informing the study was collected from

The conclusions show that existing local measures to reduce pesticide drift in the region are not effective enough to prevent pesticide exposure in public spaces. These measures include warning signs and restrictions in time of day and distance when and where pesticides can be sprayed [3].

Main findings include:

  • Despite a slight reduction in pesticide residues during the study period, residues of at least one pesticide could still be detected in 73% of the sampled sites and multiple residues could be found in 27% of the sites in 2020.
  • Fluazinam, a fungicide which is suspected to cause damage to the unborn child and which has been linked to cancer in animal studies, was detected in 74% of the contaminated sites. Other harmful pesticides like the fungicide captan (60%) and the insecticide phosmet (49%) were also frequently detected.
  • The percentage of residues with potential to cause harm to human reproduction increased significantly, from 21% in 2014 to 88% in 2020. The percentage of residues with potential to cause harm to certain organs also increased from 0% in 2014 to 21% in 2020 [4].
  • The percentage of substances with the potential to affect the endocrine system (89%) or cause cancer (45%) in humans remained constant over the study period.
  • If these concentrations of pesticide residues were found in locally grown food, they would be several magnitudes above those that are considered safe for consumption in the EU.
  • The percentage of pesticide residues detected with acute toxicity to honeybees remained high throughout the study period.
  • These findings build on a previous study showing pesticides residues were detected at distances ranging from five to 600 meters from the agricultural sites where they were originally used [2].

“With the available data we were not able to show that mitigation measures applied by the local authorities efficiently reduce pesticide contamination of non-target areas. A consistent monitoring is essential to ensure the efficiency of mitigation measures and the reduction of potential risks to humans and the environment by hazardous pesticides,”

Dr. Caroline Linhart
Ecologist and environmental epidemiologist research consultant, and lead author of the study.

In the European Union, the risk assessment of pesticides uses prediction models to estimate their distribution in the environment. However, these models do not take real-life data into consideration.

“Our data shows that official risk assessments appear to underestimate the real exposure to pesticides of non-target organisms, including humans. It is important to point out that what we have shown in this study most likely mirrors the situation in other regions with intensive apple and wine production in Europe and worldwide,”

Professor Johann Zaller
Co-author from the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences in Vienna (BOKU)

The results come just after the European Commission published a proposal for a new regulation on the sustainable use of pesticides (SUR), setting legally binding reduction targets to halve pesticide use across all EU member states by 2030 and particularly those known to cause health hazards [5]. The proposal also aims to prohibit the use of pesticides in all ‘sensitive’ areas used by the general public or of ecological importance within three metres.

Interestingly, several of these proposed EU-wide measures are less stringent than those put in place by the regional government of Bolzano-South Tyrol, where pesticides with hazardous properties cannot be used in areas used by the general public and children, nor within a 30-metre distance from them.

“Our study shows that regional measures to reduce pesticide exposure, which are stricter than those proposed by the EU Commission, are simply not enough to prevent exposure of children and the general public to substances that have the potential to cause cancer or harm reproduction. A more drastic reduction of all pesticides and a significant expansion of the suggested buffer zones to at least 50 metres are urgently needed to protect health,”

Dr. Angeliki Lyssimachou
Senior Science Policy Officer at HEAL and co-author of the study

“Even though the regional government in South-Tyrol during the last few years implemented certain mitigation measures in order to limit drift, we still see that playgrounds are contaminated with pesticides that have the potential to cause harm, posing a risk to residents and vulnerable groups”, concludes Koen Hertoge, President of PAN Europe, initiator and co-author of the study.

Contacts:

Ivonne Leenen, Senior Communications Officer at the Health and Environment Alliance (HEAL), ivonne@env-health.org

Dr. Caroline Linhart, ecologist and environmental epidemiologist research consultant and lead author of the study, linhart@research-consulting.org

Professor Johann Zaller, co-author from the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences in Vienna (BOKU), johann.zaller@boku.ac.at

Koen Hertoge, President of Pesticide Acton Network Europe and co-author of the study, koen.hertoge@gmail.com

Editor Notes:

  1. ‘Pesticide drift mitigation measures appear to reduce contamination of non-agricultural areas, but hazards to humans and the environment remain’, Science of the Total Environment volume 854 (2022) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722059137
  2. The new study builds on previous research on the distances at which pesticide residues were found in the South Tyrol region in northern Italy: ‘Pesticide contamination and associated risk factors at public playgrounds near intensively managed apple and wine orchards’, Environmental Science Europe Volume 31 (2019) https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-019-0206-0
  3. In the case of Bolzano-South Tyrol, the government started in 2014 to put additional measures in place to protect residents from exposure to pesticides. These include a 30-metre buffer zone when pesticides with hazardous properties for human health and the environment are used in proximity to areas visited by children and the general public. Only in case of additional mitigation measures such as the use of barriers (for example, trees or hedges), the distance can be reduced to five or ten-metre buffer zones.
  4. Tables from article can be accessed via 1-s2.0-S0048969722059137-ga1_lrg.jpg (2213×674) (els-cdn.com)
  5. See for example: https://www.env-health.org/heals-response-to-the-public-consultation-on-the-eu-pesticide-reduction-law-proposal/ and https://www.pan-europe.info/sites/pan-europe.info/files/public/resources/briefings/PAN%20Europe%20SUR%20PP_16092022.pdf